Who is better, Harmon or Nicklaus?
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 75.7 for Claude Harmon — a gap of 19.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Nicklaus above Claude Harmon: 95.0 vs 75.7. Jack Nicklaus leads on Honours, Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nicklaus wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Harmon wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/claude-harmon-vs-jack-nicklaus
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nicklaus leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Harmon — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | HarmonRetired | NicklausRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | — |
| Masters winning margin | 5 | — |
| Ryder Cup appearances | 1 | — |
| Professional wins | 6 | — |
| Career span in years | 31 | — |
| Major championships | — | 18 |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 73 |
| Weeks at world No. 1 | — | 0 |
| Player of the Year awards | — | 5 |
| Career prize money (M$) | — | 5.7 |
| Major runner-up finishes | — | 19 |
| Dominance w25% | 64 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 99 |
| Honours w20% | 68 | 99 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 90 |
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 75.7 for Claude Harmon — a gap of 19.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Harmon does not lead any of the five categories; Nicklaus is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Harmon: 75.7, Nicklaus: 95.0.
Make your case for Harmon vs Nicklaus. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.