GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Harmon vs Sagström

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HarmonWinner
75.7

Harmon wins: Peak, Longevity

Sagström
75.7

Sagström wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Golf

Shareable URL · /compare/claude-harmon-vs-madelene-sagstrom

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Claude Harmon
75.7

Harmon leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Club professional who won the 1948 Masters by five strokes.

1. Claude Harmon
75.7
2. Madelene Sagström
75.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Wins per season

Career timeline · Wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Wins per season
1. 🇺🇸 Claude Harmon5 seasons played · career day 4,0176 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Madelene Sagström5 seasons played · career day 1,8263 wins
-50.0% vs Harmon at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Harmon000004
🇸🇪 Sagström002223

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHarmonRetiredSagströmActive
Major titles1
Masters winning margin5
Ryder Cup appearances1
Professional wins6
Career span in years31
LPGA Tour wins1
Symetra Tour wins2
Solheim Cup appearances3
LPGA seasons10
Career best world ranking27
Dominance w25%6468
Peak w20%9284
Longevity w20%8076
Honours w20%6872
Statistics w15%7882

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Harmon75.7
Sagström75.7
The people
Harmon
Sagström

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Harmon vs Sagström. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →