Who is better, Montgomerie or Simpson?
Colin Montgomerie leads with a GOAT score of 77.5 against 77.4 for Webb Simpson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Colin Montgomerie above Webb Simpson: 77.5 vs 77.4. Colin Montgomerie leads on Longevity. Webb Simpson leads on Peak, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Montgomerie wins: Longevity
Simpson wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/colin-montgomerie-vs-webb-simpson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Montgomerie leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Montgomerie | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 🇺🇸 Simpson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MontgomerieActive | SimpsonActive |
|---|---|---|
| Order of Merit titles | 8 | — |
| European Tour wins | 31 | — |
| Ryder Cup appearances | 8 | 2 |
| Senior major titles | 3 | — |
| Major runner-up finishes | 5 | — |
| Ryder Cup points | 23.5 | — |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| Players Championship titles | — | 1 |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 7 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 82 |
Colin Montgomerie leads with a GOAT score of 77.5 against 77.4 for Webb Simpson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Simpson scores higher on peak, honours, statistics. Montgomerie leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Montgomerie: 77.5, Simpson: 77.4.
Make your case for Montgomerie vs Simpson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.