Who is better, Dodean or Li?
Li Jie leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 84.9 for Daniela Dodean Monteiro — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Dodean vs Li
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Li Jie above Daniela Dodean Monteiro: 85.2 vs 84.9. Li Jie leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LiWinner
85.2Li wins: Statistics
Dodean
84.9Dodean wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to Table TennisShareable URL · /compare/daniela-dodean-monteiro-vs-li-jie-tabletennis
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇱 Li Jie
85.2
Li leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Li Jie
2. Daniela Dodean Monteiro
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇷🇴 Daniela Dodean Monteiro5 seasons played · career day 1,825290 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇳🇱 Li Jie5 seasons played · career day 1,826286 titles
-1.4% vs Dodean at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇴 Dodean | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 290 | 591 |
| 🇳🇱 Li | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 222 | 580 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Li85.2
Dodean84.9
FAQ
Where does Dodean beat Li?
Dodean does not lead any of the five categories; Li is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Dodean vs Li score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Dodean: 84.9, Li: 85.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Dodean vs Li. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.