Who is better, Jorgić or Deng?
Deng Yaping leads with a GOAT score of 91.4 against 82.5 for Darko Jorgić — a gap of 8.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Deng Yaping above Darko Jorgić: 91.4 vs 82.5. Deng Yaping leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics. Darko Jorgić leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Deng wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Jorgić wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/darko-jorgic-vs-deng-yaping
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Deng leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Jorgić — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Jorgić — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | JorgićActive | DengRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Games titles | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 3 | — |
| World ranking peak | 8 | — |
| WTT titles | 2 | — |
| Slovenian titles | 4 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 4 |
| World titles | — | 18 |
| Years at No. 1 | — | 8 |
| World Cup titles | — | 2 |
| Singles world titles | — | 3 |
| Seasons at elite level | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 97 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 97 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 94 |
Deng Yaping leads with a GOAT score of 91.4 against 82.5 for Darko Jorgić — a gap of 8.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Jorgić scores higher on longevity. Deng leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jorgić: 82.5, Deng: 91.4.
Make your case for Jorgić vs Deng. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.