Who is better, Jorgić or Waldner?
Jan-Ove Waldner leads with a GOAT score of 94.1 against 82.5 for Darko Jorgić — a gap of 11.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jan-Ove Waldner above Darko Jorgić: 94.1 vs 82.5. Jan-Ove Waldner leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Waldner wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Jorgić wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/darko-jorgic-vs-waldner
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Waldner leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Jorgić — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Jorgić — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | JorgićActive | WaldnerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Games titles | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | 3 | — |
| World ranking peak | 8 | — |
| WTT titles | 2 | — |
| Slovenian titles | 4 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World singles titles | — | 2 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| European titles | — | 3 |
| Seasons at elite level | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 93 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 97 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 98 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 92 |
Jan-Ove Waldner leads with a GOAT score of 94.1 against 82.5 for Darko Jorgić — a gap of 11.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Jorgić does not lead any of the five categories; Waldner is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jorgić: 82.5, Waldner: 94.1.
Make your case for Jorgić vs Waldner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.