Who is better, Lingmerth or Furgol?
David Lingmerth leads with a GOAT score of 75.0 against 74.8 for Ed Furgol — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks David Lingmerth above Ed Furgol: 75.0 vs 74.8. David Lingmerth leads on Statistics, Dominance. Ed Furgol leads on Peak, Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Lingmerth wins: Dominance, Statistics
Furgol wins: Peak, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/david-lingmerth-vs-ed-furgol
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Lingmerth leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Lingmerth | 0 | 0 | 0 | 280 | 650 | 1,051 |
| 🇺🇸 Furgol | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LingmerthActive | FurgolRetired |
|---|---|---|
| PGA Tour wins | 1 | 6 |
| Korn Ferry Tour wins | 2 | — |
| Highest world ranking | 56 | — |
| PGA Tour top-ten finishes | 12 | — |
| Professional years | 14 | — |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 1 |
| PGA Player of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Career span in years | — | 26 |
| Dominance w25% | 66 | 62 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 64 | 66 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 78 |
David Lingmerth leads with a GOAT score of 75.0 against 74.8 for Ed Furgol — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Furgol scores higher on peak, honours, longevity. Lingmerth leads on dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lingmerth: 75.0, Furgol: 74.8.
Make your case for Lingmerth vs Furgol. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.