Who is better, Love III or Woods?
Tiger Woods leads with a GOAT score of 94.4 against 86.4 for Davis Love III — a gap of 8.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Tiger Woods above Davis Love III: 94.4 vs 86.4. Tiger Woods leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Davis Love III leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Woods wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Love III wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/davis-love-iii-vs-tiger-woods
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Woods leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Love III — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Love III — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | Love IIIActive | WoodsActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major titles | 1 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 21 | 82 |
| Players Championships | 1 | — |
| Ryder Cup appearances | 6 | — |
| Ryder Cup captaincies | 2 | — |
| Major championships | — | 15 |
| Weeks at world No. 1 | — | 683 |
| Player of the Year awards | — | 11 |
| Career prize money (M$) | — | 120.9 |
| Cuts made streak | — | 142 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 99 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 100 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 96 |
Tiger Woods leads with a GOAT score of 94.4 against 86.4 for Davis Love III — a gap of 8.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Love III scores higher on longevity. Woods leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Love III: 86.4, Woods: 94.4.
Make your case for Love III vs Woods. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.