Who is better, Deng or Hwan-hwan?
Deng Yaping leads with a GOAT score of 91.4 against 24.4 for Choi Hwan-hwan — a gap of 67.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Deng vs Hwan-hwan
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Deng Yaping above Choi Hwan-hwan: 91.4 vs 24.4. Deng Yaping leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DengWinner
91.4Deng wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Hwan-hwan
24.4Hwan-hwan wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to Table TennisShareable URL · /compare/deng-yaping-vs-disc-choi-hwan-hwan
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Deng Yaping
91.4
Deng leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Hwan-hwan — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Deng Yaping
2. Choi Hwan-hwan
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Form index per season
1. 🇨🇳 Deng Yaping57 titles
6 seasons by age 21 · 9.5 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Hwan-hwan — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Deng91.4
Hwan-hwan24.4
FAQ
Where does Hwan-hwan beat Deng?
Hwan-hwan does not lead any of the five categories; Deng is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Deng vs Hwan-hwan score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Deng: 91.4, Hwan-hwan: 24.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Deng vs Hwan-hwan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.