Who is better, Deng or Freudenheim?
Deng Yaping leads with a GOAT score of 91.4 against 18.7 for Eduard Freudenheim — a gap of 72.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Deng Yaping above Eduard Freudenheim: 91.4 vs 18.7. Deng Yaping leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Deng wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Freudenheim wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/deng-yaping-vs-disc-eduard-freudenheim
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Deng leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Freudenheim — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Freudenheim — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | DengRetired | FreudenheimRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 4 | — |
| World titles | 18 | — |
| Years at No. 1 | 8 | — |
| World Cup titles | 2 | — |
| Singles world titles | 3 | — |
| Seasons at elite level | 10 | — |
| Dominance w25% | 97 | 18.6 |
| Peak w20% | 97 | 20.6 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 16.6 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 19.6 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 17.6 |
Deng Yaping leads with a GOAT score of 91.4 against 18.7 for Eduard Freudenheim — a gap of 72.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Freudenheim does not lead any of the five categories; Deng is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Deng: 91.4, Freudenheim: 18.7.
Make your case for Deng vs Freudenheim. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.