Who is better, Deng or Carnatz?
Deng Yaping leads with a GOAT score of 91.4 against 23.1 for Ingeborg Carnatz — a gap of 68.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Deng vs Carnatz
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Deng Yaping above Ingeborg Carnatz: 91.4 vs 23.1. Deng Yaping leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DengWinner
91.4Deng wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Carnatz
23.1Carnatz wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to Table TennisShareable URL · /compare/deng-yaping-vs-disc-ingeborg-carnatz
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Deng Yaping
91.4
Deng leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Carnatz — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Deng Yaping
2. Ingeborg Carnatz
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Form index per season
1. 🇨🇳 Deng Yaping57 titles
6 seasons by age 21 · 9.5 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Carnatz — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Deng91.4
Carnatz23.1
FAQ
Where does Carnatz beat Deng?
Carnatz does not lead any of the five categories; Deng is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Deng vs Carnatz score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Deng: 91.4, Carnatz: 23.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Deng vs Carnatz. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.