Who is better, Deng or Póta?
Deng Yaping leads with a GOAT score of 91.4 against 82.4 for Georgina Póta — a gap of 9.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Deng Yaping above Georgina Póta: 91.4 vs 82.4. Deng Yaping leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Georgina Póta leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Deng wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Póta wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/deng-yaping-vs-georgina-pota
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Deng leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Póta — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Póta — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | DengRetired | PótaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 4 | — |
| World titles | 18 | — |
| Years at No. 1 | 8 | — |
| World Cup titles | 2 | — |
| Singles world titles | 3 | — |
| Seasons at elite level | 10 | — |
| European Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Hungarian titles | — | 12 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 4 |
| World ranking peak | — | 18 |
| European team medals | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 97 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 97 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 84 |
Deng Yaping leads with a GOAT score of 91.4 against 82.4 for Georgina Póta — a gap of 9.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Póta scores higher on longevity. Deng leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Deng: 91.4, Póta: 82.4.
Make your case for Deng vs Póta. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.