Who is better, Douglas or Lupulesku?
Desmond Douglas leads with a GOAT score of 80.6 against 80.5 for Ilija Lupulesku — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Desmond Douglas above Ilija Lupulesku: 80.6 vs 80.5. Desmond Douglas leads on Longevity. Ilija Lupulesku leads on Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Douglas wins: Longevity
Lupulesku wins: Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/desmond-douglas-vs-ilija-lupulesku-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Douglas leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Douglas | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 336 | 700 |
| 🇷🇸 Lupulesku | 0 | 0 | 48 | 103 | 310 | 655 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DouglasRetired | LupuleskuRetired |
|---|---|---|
| English national titles | 11 | — |
| European medals | 3 | — |
| Commonwealth Championship golds | 5 | — |
| Career high European ranking | 1 | — |
| Years at the top level | 21 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| European Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 4 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 80 |
Desmond Douglas leads with a GOAT score of 80.6 against 80.5 for Ilija Lupulesku — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lupulesku scores higher on honours, statistics. Douglas leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Douglas: 80.6, Lupulesku: 80.5.
Make your case for Douglas vs Lupulesku. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.