Who is better, Douglas or Apolónia?
Desmond Douglas leads with a GOAT score of 80.6 against 80.6 for Tiago Apolónia — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Desmond Douglas and Tiago Apolónia level at 80.6. Desmond Douglas leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Tiago Apolónia leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Douglas wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Apolónia wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/desmond-douglas-vs-tiago-apolonia
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Douglas leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Douglas | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 336 | 700 |
| 🇵🇹 Apolónia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 160 | 328 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DouglasRetired | ApolóniaActive |
|---|---|---|
| English national titles | 11 | — |
| European medals | 3 | — |
| Commonwealth Championship golds | 5 | — |
| Career high European ranking | 1 | — |
| Years at the top level | 21 | — |
| European team titles | — | 1 |
| European Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Olympic Games | — | 4 |
| Career highest world ranking | — | 16 |
| Seasons on the pro tour | — | 22 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 84 |
Desmond Douglas leads with a GOAT score of 80.6 against 80.6 for Tiago Apolónia — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Apolónia scores higher on statistics, longevity. Douglas leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Douglas: 80.6, Apolónia: 80.6.
Make your case for Douglas vs Apolónia. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.