Who is better, Agopoff or Waldner?
Jan-Ove Waldner leads with a GOAT score of 94.1 against 29.2 for Alex Agopoff — a gap of 64.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Agopoff vs Waldner
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jan-Ove Waldner above Alex Agopoff: 94.1 vs 29.2. Jan-Ove Waldner leads on Longevity, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WaldnerWinner
94.1Waldner wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Agopoff
29.2Agopoff wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to Table TennisShareable URL · /compare/disc-alex-agopoff-vs-waldner
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Jan-Ove Waldner
94.1
Waldner leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Agopoff — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Jan-Ove Waldner
2. Alex Agopoff
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 22 · Form index per season
1. 🇸🇪 Jan-Ove Waldner3 titles
1 season by age 22 · 3 per season
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Agopoff — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Waldner94.1
Agopoff29.2
FAQ
Where does Agopoff beat Waldner?
Agopoff does not lead any of the five categories; Waldner is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Agopoff vs Waldner score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Agopoff: 29.2, Waldner: 94.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Agopoff vs Waldner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.