Who is better, Hae-sook or Waldner?
Jan-Ove Waldner leads with a GOAT score of 94.1 against 22.3 for An Hae-sook — a gap of 71.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hae-sook vs Waldner
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jan-Ove Waldner above An Hae-sook: 94.1 vs 22.3. Jan-Ove Waldner leads on Longevity, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WaldnerWinner
94.1Waldner wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Hae-sook
22.3Hae-sook wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to Table TennisShareable URL · /compare/disc-an-hae-sook-vs-waldner
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇸🇪 Jan-Ove Waldner
94.1
Waldner leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Hae-sook — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Jan-Ove Waldner
2. An Hae-sook
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 22 · Form index per season
1. 🇸🇪 Jan-Ove Waldner3 titles
1 season by age 22 · 3 per season
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Hae-sook — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Waldner94.1
Hae-sook22.3
FAQ
Where does Hae-sook beat Waldner?
Hae-sook does not lead any of the five categories; Waldner is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Hae-sook vs Waldner score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hae-sook: 22.3, Waldner: 94.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hae-sook vs Waldner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.