Who is better, Jae-hyun or Ma Long?
Ma Long leads with a GOAT score of 97.3 against 28.9 for An Jae-hyun — a gap of 68.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Jae-hyun vs Ma Long
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ma Long above An Jae-hyun: 97.3 vs 28.9. Ma Long leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Ma LongWinner
97.3Ma Long wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Jae-hyun
28.9Jae-hyun wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to Table TennisShareable URL · /compare/disc-an-jae-hyun-vs-ma-long
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Ma Long
97.3
Ma Long leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Jae-hyun — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Ma Long
2. An Jae-hyun
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Form index per season
1. 🇨🇳 Ma Long7 titles
2 seasons by age 21 · 3.5 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Jae-hyun — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Ma Long97.3
Jae-hyun28.9
FAQ
Where does Jae-hyun beat Ma Long?
Jae-hyun does not lead any of the five categories; Ma Long is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Jae-hyun vs Ma Long score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jae-hyun: 28.9, Ma Long: 97.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Jae-hyun vs Ma Long. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.