Who is better, Wilmott or Waldner?
Jan-Ove Waldner leads with a GOAT score of 94.1 against 24.9 for Arthur Wilmott — a gap of 69.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jan-Ove Waldner above Arthur Wilmott: 94.1 vs 24.9. Jan-Ove Waldner leads on Longevity, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Waldner wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Wilmott wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/disc-arthur-wilmott-vs-waldner
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Waldner leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Wilmott — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Wilmott — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Jan-Ove Waldner leads with a GOAT score of 94.1 against 24.9 for Arthur Wilmott — a gap of 69.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Wilmott does not lead any of the five categories; Waldner is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wilmott: 24.9, Waldner: 94.1.
Make your case for Wilmott vs Waldner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.