Who is better, Coombs or Waldner?
Jan-Ove Waldner leads with a GOAT score of 94.1 against 31.8 for Audrey Coombs — a gap of 62.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jan-Ove Waldner above Audrey Coombs: 94.1 vs 31.8. Jan-Ove Waldner leads on Longevity, Peak, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Waldner wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Coombs wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/disc-audrey-coombs-vs-waldner
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Waldner leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Coombs — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Coombs — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Jan-Ove Waldner leads with a GOAT score of 94.1 against 31.8 for Audrey Coombs — a gap of 62.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Coombs does not lead any of the five categories; Waldner is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Coombs: 31.8, Waldner: 94.1.
Make your case for Coombs vs Waldner. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.