Who is better, Jong-chol or Ma Long?
Ma Long leads with a GOAT score of 97.3 against 29.4 for Chu Jong-chol — a gap of 67.9 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Jong-chol vs Ma Long
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ma Long above Chu Jong-chol: 97.3 vs 29.4. Ma Long leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Ma LongWinner
97.3Ma Long wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Jong-chol
29.4Jong-chol wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to Table TennisShareable URL · /compare/disc-chu-jong-chol-vs-ma-long
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Ma Long
97.3
Ma Long leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Jong-chol — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Ma Long
2. Chu Jong-chol
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Form index per season
1. 🇨🇳 Ma Long7 titles
2 seasons by age 21 · 3.5 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Jong-chol — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Ma Long97.3
Jong-chol29.4
FAQ
Where does Jong-chol beat Ma Long?
Jong-chol does not lead any of the five categories; Ma Long is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Jong-chol vs Ma Long score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jong-chol: 29.4, Ma Long: 97.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Jong-chol vs Ma Long. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.