Who is better, Amouretti or Ma Long?
Ma Long leads with a GOAT score of 97.3 against 18.7 for Guy Amouretti — a gap of 78.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Amouretti vs Ma Long
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ma Long above Guy Amouretti: 97.3 vs 18.7. Ma Long leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Ma LongWinner
97.3Ma Long wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Amouretti
18.7Amouretti wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to Table TennisShareable URL · /compare/disc-guy-amouretti-vs-ma-long
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Ma Long
97.3
Ma Long leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Amouretti — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Ma Long
2. Guy Amouretti
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Form index per season
1. 🇨🇳 Ma Long7 titles
2 seasons by age 21 · 3.5 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Amouretti — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Ma Long97.3
Amouretti18.7
FAQ
Where does Amouretti beat Ma Long?
Amouretti does not lead any of the five categories; Ma Long is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Amouretti vs Ma Long score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Amouretti: 18.7, Ma Long: 97.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Amouretti vs Ma Long. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.