Who is better, Caponi or Lehman?
Tom Lehman leads with a GOAT score of 83.5 against 83.3 for Donna Caponi — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Caponi vs Lehman
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Tom Lehman above Donna Caponi: 83.5 vs 83.3. Tom Lehman leads on Longevity, Peak, Statistics. Donna Caponi leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LehmanWinner
83.5Lehman wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Caponi
83.3Caponi wins: Dominance, Honours
Candidates
Locked to GolfShareable URL · /compare/donna-caponi-vs-tom-lehman
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Tom Lehman
83.5
Lehman leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Tom Lehman
2. Donna Caponi
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Donna Caponi5 seasons played · career day 3,2866 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Tom Lehman5 seasons played · career day 5,4785 wins
-16.7% vs Caponi at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Caponi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| 🇺🇸 Lehman | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Lehman83.5
Caponi83.3
FAQ
Where does Caponi beat Lehman?
Caponi scores higher on dominance, honours. Lehman leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
How is the Caponi vs Lehman score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Caponi: 83.3, Lehman: 83.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Caponi vs Lehman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.