Who is better, Johnson or De Vicenzo?
Dustin Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 89.3 against 89.2 for Roberto De Vicenzo — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Dustin Johnson above Roberto De Vicenzo: 89.3 vs 89.2. Dustin Johnson leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Roberto De Vicenzo leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Johnson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
De Vicenzo wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/dustin-johnson-vs-roberto-de-vicenzo
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Johnson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 🇦🇷 De Vicenzo | 0 | 0 | 30 | 62 | 172 | 349 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JohnsonActive | De VicenzoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major championships | 2 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 24 | — |
| Weeks at world number one | 135 | — |
| FedEx Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Ryder Cup appearances | 5 | — |
| Open Championships | — | 1 |
| Professional wins worldwide | — | 230 |
| Argentine Open titles | — | 9 |
| World Cup team titles | — | 1 |
| Seasons played | — | 48 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 92 |
Dustin Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 89.3 against 89.2 for Roberto De Vicenzo — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
De Vicenzo scores higher on longevity. Johnson leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Johnson: 89.3, De Vicenzo: 89.2.
Make your case for Johnson vs De Vicenzo. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.