Who is better, Romero or Duncan?
George Duncan leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.4 for Eduardo Romero — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks George Duncan above Eduardo Romero: 85.6 vs 85.4. George Duncan leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Eduardo Romero leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Duncan wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Romero wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/eduardo-romero-vs-george-duncan
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Duncan leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇷 Romero | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 240 | 460 |
| 🇬🇧 Duncan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 30 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RomeroRetired | DuncanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Tour wins | 8 | — |
| Senior major titles | 1 | — |
| Argentine Open titles | 5 | — |
| Professional years | 34 | — |
| World Cup appearances | 8 | — |
| Open Championships | — | 1 |
| Ryder Cup wins as captain | — | 1 |
| Professional wins | — | 15 |
| Open top-five finishes | — | 8 |
| Career years | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
George Duncan leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.4 for Eduardo Romero — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Romero scores higher on statistics, longevity. Duncan leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Romero: 85.4, Duncan: 85.6.
Make your case for Romero vs Duncan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.