Who is better, Samara or Ma Long?
Ma Long leads with a GOAT score of 97.3 against 85.3 for Elizabeta Samara — a gap of 12.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ma Long above Elizabeta Samara: 97.3 vs 85.3. Ma Long leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ma Long wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Samara wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/elizabeta-samara-vs-ma-long
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ma Long leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Samara — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Samara — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | SamaraActive | Ma LongActive |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship titles | 2 | — |
| European team titles | 4 | — |
| World ranking peak | 9 | — |
| Romanian titles | 10 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 4 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 6 |
| World singles titles | — | 3 |
| World Cup titles | — | 3 |
| Olympic medals | — | 6 |
| Months at world No. 1 | — | 64 |
| Grand Slam completed | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 99 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 99 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 99 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 97 |
Ma Long leads with a GOAT score of 97.3 against 85.3 for Elizabeta Samara — a gap of 12.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Samara does not lead any of the five categories; Ma Long is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Samara: 85.3, Ma Long: 97.3.
Make your case for Samara vs Ma Long. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.