Who is better, Antonyan or Jiang?
Elmira Antonyan leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.5 for Jiang Jialiang — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Elmira Antonyan above Jiang Jialiang: 84.6 vs 84.5. Elmira Antonyan leads on Longevity. Jiang Jialiang leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Antonyan wins: Longevity
Jiang wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/elmira-antonyan-vs-jiang-jialiang
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Antonyan leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇲 Antonyan | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 254 | 670 |
| 🇨🇳 Jiang | 0 | 0 | 64 | 142 | 422 | 720 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AntonyanRetired | JiangRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European titles | 3 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Soviet titles | 6 | — |
| European Championship medals | 7 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 5 | — |
| World Championship singles titles | — | 2 |
| World team titles | — | 3 |
| World Cup medals | — | 2 |
| Asian Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Years at the top level | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Elmira Antonyan leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.5 for Jiang Jialiang — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Jiang scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Antonyan leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Antonyan: 84.6, Jiang: 84.5.
Make your case for Antonyan vs Jiang. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.