Who is better, Antonyan or Schlager?
Elmira Antonyan leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.6 for Werner Schlager — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Elmira Antonyan and Werner Schlager level at 84.6. Elmira Antonyan leads on Honours, Dominance, Statistics. Werner Schlager leads on Longevity, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Antonyan wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Schlager wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/elmira-antonyan-vs-werner-schlager
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Antonyan leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇲 Antonyan | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 254 | 670 |
| 🇦🇹 Schlager | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AntonyanRetired | SchlagerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European titles | 3 | 2 |
| World Championship medals | 2 | 4 |
| Soviet titles | 6 | — |
| European Championship medals | 7 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 5 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 1 |
| Career-high world ranking | — | 3 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Elmira Antonyan leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.6 for Werner Schlager — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Schlager scores higher on peak, longevity. Antonyan leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Antonyan: 84.6, Schlager: 84.6.
Make your case for Antonyan vs Schlager. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.