Who is better, Földi or Wang Liqin?
Ernő Földi leads with a GOAT score of 79.2 against 79.2 for Wang Liqin — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ernő Földi and Wang Liqin level at 79.2. Ernő Földi leads on Peak, Statistics, Honours. Wang Liqin leads on Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Földi wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Wang Liqin wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/erno-foldi-vs-wang-liqin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Földi leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇭🇺 Földi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 23 | 49 |
| 🇨🇳 Wang Liqin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FöldiRetired | Wang LiqinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 4 | — |
| Hungarian national titles | 3 | — |
| Team world titles | 2 | — |
| Seasons at international level | 11 | — |
| World Championship singles titles | — | 3 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World team titles | — | 7 |
| Months at No. 1 | — | 25 |
| ITTF Tour titles | — | 21 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 78 |
Ernő Földi leads with a GOAT score of 79.2 against 79.2 for Wang Liqin — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Wang Liqin scores higher on dominance, longevity. Földi leads on peak, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Földi: 79.2, Wang Liqin: 79.2.
Make your case for Földi vs Wang Liqin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.