Who is better, Feng or Liu Guoliang?
Feng Mengya leads with a GOAT score of 74.9 against 74.8 for Liu Guoliang — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Feng Mengya above Liu Guoliang: 74.9 vs 74.8. Feng Mengya leads on Statistics, Longevity, Peak. Liu Guoliang leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Feng wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Liu Guoliang wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/feng-mengya-vs-liu-guoliang
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Feng leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Feng | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150 | 264 |
| 🇨🇳 Liu Guoliang | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 25 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FengActive | Liu GuoliangRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Tour titles | 2 | — |
| Asian Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Chinese Super League seasons | 10 | — |
| Career highest world ranking | 12 | — |
| National team call-ups | 15 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| World Championship titles | — | 3 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Grand Slams completed | — | 1 |
| World team titles | — | 2 |
| Asian Championship titles | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 68 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 74 |
Feng Mengya leads with a GOAT score of 74.9 against 74.8 for Liu Guoliang — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Liu Guoliang scores higher on dominance, honours. Feng leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Feng: 74.9, Liu Guoliang: 74.8.
Make your case for Feng vs Liu Guoliang. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.