Who is better, Feng or Baum?
Patrick Baum leads with a GOAT score of 75.4 against 74.9 for Feng Mengya — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Patrick Baum above Feng Mengya: 75.4 vs 74.9. Patrick Baum leads on Longevity, Honours. Feng Mengya leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Baum wins: Longevity, Honours
Feng wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/feng-mengya-vs-patrick-baum-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baum leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Feng | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150 | 264 |
| 🇩🇪 Baum | 0 | 0 | 42 | 89 | 256 | 542 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FengActive | BaumRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Tour titles | 2 | — |
| Asian Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Chinese Super League seasons | 10 | — |
| Career highest world ranking | 12 | — |
| National team call-ups | 15 | — |
| European team titles | — | 2 |
| World Championship team medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 22 |
| Bundesliga seasons | — | 15 |
| Dominance w25% | 68 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 79 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 76 |
Patrick Baum leads with a GOAT score of 75.4 against 74.9 for Feng Mengya — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Feng scores higher on peak, statistics. Baum leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Feng: 74.9, Baum: 75.4.
Make your case for Feng vs Baum. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.