Who is better, Feng or Ni?
Ni Xialian leads with a GOAT score of 86.2 against 85.6 for Feng Tianwei — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ni Xialian above Feng Tianwei: 86.2 vs 85.6. Ni Xialian leads on Longevity. Feng Tianwei leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ni wins: Longevity
Feng wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/feng-tianwei-vs-ni-xialian
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ni leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇬 Feng | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 40 |
| 🇱🇺 Ni | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 28 | 64 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FengActive | NiActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 3 | — |
| World team titles | 1 | — |
| World Cup team titles | 2 | — |
| Commonwealth golds | 6 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 2 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 2 |
| European titles | — | 3 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 6 |
| European Championship medals | — | 8 |
| Professional seasons | — | 40 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Ni Xialian leads with a GOAT score of 86.2 against 85.6 for Feng Tianwei — a gap of 0.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Feng scores higher on peak, statistics. Ni leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Feng: 85.6, Ni: 86.2.
Make your case for Feng vs Ni. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.