Who is better, Gergely or De Nutte?
Gábor Gergely leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Sarah De Nutte — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Gábor Gergely and Sarah De Nutte level at 81.9. Gábor Gergely leads on Honours, Dominance. Sarah De Nutte leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gergely wins: Dominance, Honours
De Nutte wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/gabor-gergely-tt-vs-sarah-de-nutte
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gergely leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇭🇺 Gergely | 0 | 0 | 48 | 101 | 293 | 622 |
| 🇱🇺 De Nutte | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 228 | 614 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GergelyRetired | De NutteActive |
|---|---|---|
| World team titles | 1 | — |
| European Championship titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 3 | — |
| National titles | 8 | — |
| Career world ranking best | 6 | — |
| European Games medals | — | 2 |
| Luxembourg titles | — | 10 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| European Championship appearances | — | 8 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 86 |
Gábor Gergely leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Sarah De Nutte — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
De Nutte scores higher on statistics, longevity. Gergely leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gergely: 81.9, De Nutte: 81.9.
Make your case for Gergely vs De Nutte. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.