Who is better, Sarazen or Webb?
Karrie Webb leads with a GOAT score of 86.5 against 86.4 for Gene Sarazen — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Sarazen vs Webb
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Karrie Webb above Gene Sarazen: 86.5 vs 86.4. Karrie Webb leads on Statistics. Gene Sarazen leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WebbWinner
86.5Webb wins: Statistics
Sarazen
86.4Sarazen wins: Dominance
Candidates
Locked to GolfShareable URL · /compare/gene-sarazen-vs-karrie-webb
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Karrie Webb
86.5
Webb leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Karrie Webb
2. Gene Sarazen
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Karrie Webb5 seasons played · career day 2,55623 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Gene Sarazen5 seasons played · career day 2,5566 wins
-73.9% vs Webb at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Sarazen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 |
| 🇦🇺 Webb | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 27 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Webb86.5
Sarazen86.4
FAQ
Where does Sarazen beat Webb?
Sarazen scores higher on dominance. Webb leads on statistics.
How is the Sarazen vs Webb score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sarazen: 86.4, Webb: 86.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Sarazen vs Webb. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.