Who is better, Guo Yue or Robinot?
Quentin Robinot leads with a GOAT score of 74.8 against 74.6 for Guo Yue — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Quentin Robinot above Guo Yue: 74.8 vs 74.6. Quentin Robinot leads on Longevity, Statistics. Guo Yue leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Robinot wins: Longevity, Statistics
Guo Yue wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/guo-yue-vs-quentin-robinot-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Robinot leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Guo Yue | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
| 🇫🇷 Robinot | 0 | 0 | 42 | 88 | 254 | 538 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Guo YueRetired | RobinotActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship singles titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World team titles | 6 | — |
| World Cup medals | 2 | — |
| ITTF Tour titles | 15 | — |
| Months at No. 1 | 6 | — |
| European team titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship team medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 43 |
| National titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 74 | 76 |
Quentin Robinot leads with a GOAT score of 74.8 against 74.6 for Guo Yue — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Guo Yue scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Robinot leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Guo Yue: 74.6, Robinot: 74.8.
Make your case for Guo Yue vs Robinot. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.