Who is better, Guo Yue or Walther?
Guo Yue leads with a GOAT score of 74.6 against 74.3 for Ricardo Walther — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Guo Yue above Ricardo Walther: 74.6 vs 74.3. Guo Yue leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Ricardo Walther leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Guo Yue wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Walther wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/guo-yue-vs-ricardo-walther-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Guo Yue leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 Guo Yue | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
| 🇩🇪 Walther | 0 | 0 | 42 | 88 | 250 | 522 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Guo YueRetired | WaltherActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship singles titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World team titles | 6 | — |
| World Cup medals | 2 | — |
| ITTF Tour titles | 15 | — |
| Months at No. 1 | 6 | — |
| European team titles | — | 2 |
| European Games medals | — | 1 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 35 |
| Bundesliga seasons | — | 16 |
| National medals | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 66 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 74 | 76 |
Guo Yue leads with a GOAT score of 74.6 against 74.3 for Ricardo Walther — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Walther scores higher on statistics, longevity. Guo Yue leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Guo Yue: 74.6, Walther: 74.3.
Make your case for Guo Yue vs Walther. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.