Who is better, Alser or Zhang Yining?
Zhang Yining leads with a GOAT score of 80.4 against 80.3 for Hans Alser — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Zhang Yining above Hans Alser: 80.4 vs 80.3. Zhang Yining leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics. Hans Alser leads on Longevity, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Zhang Yining wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Alser wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/hans-alser-vs-zhang-yining
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Zhang Yining leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Alser | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 268 | 704 |
| 🇨🇳 Zhang Yining | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 38 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AlserRetired | Zhang YiningRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European titles | 2 | — |
| World team titles | 1 | 4 |
| World Championship medals | 4 | — |
| Swedish national titles | 6 | — |
| Years at the top level | 15 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 4 |
| World Championship singles titles | — | 2 |
| World Cup singles titles | — | 4 |
| Months at No. 1 | — | 64 |
| ITTF Tour titles | — | 20 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 80 |
Zhang Yining leads with a GOAT score of 80.4 against 80.3 for Hans Alser — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Alser scores higher on peak, longevity. Zhang Yining leads on dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Alser: 80.3, Zhang Yining: 80.4.
Make your case for Alser vs Zhang Yining. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.