Who is better, Hilton or Thomson?
Harold Hilton leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.4 for Peter Thomson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Harold Hilton above Peter Thomson: 84.5 vs 84.4. Harold Hilton leads on Peak. Peter Thomson leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hilton wins: Peak
Thomson wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/harold-hilton-vs-peter-thomson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hilton leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Hilton | 0 | 0 | 35 | 75 | 228 | 508 |
| 🇦🇺 Thomson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 26 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HiltonRetired | ThomsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Open Championships | 2 | 5 |
| Amateur Championships | 4 | — |
| US Amateur titles | 1 | — |
| Irish Open Amateur titles | 4 | — |
| Seasons in competition | 24 | — |
| Major titles | — | 5 |
| Career worldwide wins | — | 90 |
| Senior tour wins | — | 11 |
| Open runner-up finishes | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 82 |
Harold Hilton leads with a GOAT score of 84.5 against 84.4 for Peter Thomson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Thomson scores higher on statistics, longevity. Hilton leads on peak.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hilton: 84.5, Thomson: 84.4.
Make your case for Hilton vs Thomson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.