Who is better, Kirkaldy or Parnevik?
Hugh Kirkaldy leads with a GOAT score of 69.7 against 55.3 for Jesper Parnevik — a gap of 14.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Hugh Kirkaldy above Jesper Parnevik: 69.7 vs 55.3. Hugh Kirkaldy leads on Peak, Statistics, Honours. Jesper Parnevik leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kirkaldy wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Parnevik wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/hugh-kirkaldy-vs-jesper-parnevik
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kirkaldy leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Kirkaldy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 🇸🇪 Parnevik | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KirkaldyRetired | ParnevikRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Open Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Open top-fives | 3 | — |
| Career span in years | 10 | — |
| Open starts | 8 | — |
| Professional wins | 2 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 5 |
| European Tour wins | — | 6 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 3 |
| Major runner-up finishes | — | 2 |
| Career worldwide wins | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 62 | 50 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 62 |
| Longevity w20% | 60 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 66 | 48 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 56 |
Hugh Kirkaldy leads with a GOAT score of 69.7 against 55.3 for Jesper Parnevik — a gap of 14.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Parnevik scores higher on longevity. Kirkaldy leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kirkaldy: 69.7, Parnevik: 55.3.
Make your case for Kirkaldy vs Parnevik. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.