Who is better, Hyun or Maze?
Michael Maze leads with a GOAT score of 79.4 against 79.2 for Hyun Jung-hwa — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hyun vs Maze
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Michael Maze above Hyun Jung-hwa: 79.4 vs 79.2. Michael Maze leads on Longevity, Peak. Hyun Jung-hwa leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MazeWinner
79.4Maze wins: Peak, Longevity
Hyun
79.2Hyun wins: Dominance
Candidates
Locked to Table TennisShareable URL · /compare/hyun-jung-hwa-vs-michael-maze
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇰 Michael Maze
79.4
Maze leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Michael Maze
2. Hyun Jung-hwa
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇩🇰 Michael Maze5 seasons played · career day 1,825352 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇰🇷 Hyun Jung-hwa5 seasons played · career day 2,19111 titles
-96.9% vs Maze at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Hyun | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 20 |
| 🇩🇰 Maze | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 352 | 692 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Maze79.4
Hyun79.2
FAQ
Where does Hyun beat Maze?
Hyun scores higher on dominance. Maze leads on peak, longevity.
How is the Hyun vs Maze score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hyun: 79.2, Maze: 79.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hyun vs Maze. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.