Who is better, Ogimura or Vacenovská?
Ichiro Ogimura leads with a GOAT score of 76.9 against 76.8 for Iveta Vacenovská — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ichiro Ogimura above Iveta Vacenovská: 76.9 vs 76.8. Ichiro Ogimura leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Iveta Vacenovská leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ogimura wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Vacenovská wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ichiro-ogimura-vs-iveta-vacenovska-tt
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ogimura leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Ogimura | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 27 |
| 🇨🇿 Vacenovská | 0 | 0 | 44 | 92 | 198 | 527 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | OgimuraRetired | VacenovskáRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship singles titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship titles (all) | 12 | — |
| World team titles | 5 | — |
| Asian titles | 4 | — |
| Japanese titles | 6 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| European Championship medals | — | 2 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 3 |
| ITTF World Tour medals | — | 3 |
| Career world ranking best | — | 14 |
| National titles | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 74 | 78 |
Ichiro Ogimura leads with a GOAT score of 76.9 against 76.8 for Iveta Vacenovská — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Vacenovská scores higher on statistics, longevity. Ogimura leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ogimura: 76.9, Vacenovská: 76.8.
Make your case for Ogimura vs Vacenovská. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.