Who is better, Ogimura or Persson?
Jörgen Persson leads with a GOAT score of 77.0 against 76.9 for Ichiro Ogimura — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jörgen Persson above Ichiro Ogimura: 77.0 vs 76.9. Jörgen Persson leads on Longevity. Ichiro Ogimura leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Persson wins: Longevity
Ogimura wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ichiro-ogimura-vs-jorgen-persson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Persson leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇵 Ogimura | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 27 |
| 🇸🇪 Persson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 23 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | OgimuraRetired | PerssonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship singles titles | 2 | 1 |
| World Championship titles (all) | 12 | — |
| World team titles | 5 | 4 |
| Asian titles | 4 | — |
| Japanese titles | 6 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| European Championship titles | — | 3 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 7 |
| Years at top level | — | 29 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 74 | 74 |
Jörgen Persson leads with a GOAT score of 77.0 against 76.9 for Ichiro Ogimura — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ogimura scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Persson leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ogimura: 76.9, Persson: 77.0.
Make your case for Ogimura vs Persson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.