Who is better, Burns or Brooks?
Jack Burns leads with a GOAT score of 78.2 against 78.1 for Mark Brooks — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Burns above Mark Brooks: 78.2 vs 78.1. Jack Burns leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Mark Brooks leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Burns wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Brooks wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-burns-vs-mark-brooks
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Burns leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Burns | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| 🇺🇸 Brooks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BurnsRetired | BrooksRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Open Championships | 1 | — |
| Open top-ten finishes | 4 | — |
| Career years | 16 | — |
| Open appearances | 12 | — |
| Course record rounds | 2 | — |
| Major titles | — | 1 |
| PGA Tour wins | — | 7 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 1 |
| Best season wins | — | 3 |
| Career span in years | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Jack Burns leads with a GOAT score of 78.2 against 78.1 for Mark Brooks — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brooks scores higher on longevity. Burns leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Burns: 78.2, Brooks: 78.1.
Make your case for Burns vs Brooks. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.