GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Burns vs Taylor

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

Quick answer

GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Burns above Nick Taylor: 78.2 vs 78.1. Jack Burns leads on Dominance, Peak. Nick Taylor leads on Longevity.

How the GOAT Score is calculated →
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BurnsWinner
78.2

Burns wins: Dominance, Peak

Taylor
78.1

Taylor wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Golf

Shareable URL · /compare/jack-burns-vs-nick-taylor-golf

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Jack Burns
78.2

Burns leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.

1. Jack Burns
78.2
2. Nick Taylor
78.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇬🇧 Jack Burns5 seasons played · career day 3,65223 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Nick Taylor5 seasons played · career day 3,6511 wins
-95.7% vs Burns at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Burns0000017
🇨🇦 Taylor000001

Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.

MetricBurnsRetiredTaylorActive
Open Championships1—
Open top-ten finishes4—
Career years16—
Open appearances12—
Course record rounds2—
PGA Tour wins—4
Canadian Open titles—1
Presidents Cup appearances—2
Seasons on tour—12
Career best world ranking—27
Dominance w25%7270
Peak w20%9088
Longevity w20%7478
Honours w20%7474
Statistics w15%8484

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Burns78.2
Taylor78.1
The people
Burns
Taylor

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

FAQ

Who is better, Burns or Taylor?

Jack Burns leads with a GOAT score of 78.2 against 78.1 for Nick Taylor — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.

Where does Taylor beat Burns?

Taylor scores higher on longevity. Burns leads on peak, dominance.

How is the Burns vs Taylor score calculated?

Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Burns: 78.2, Taylor: 78.1.

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Burns vs Taylor. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →