Who is better, Burns or Kidd?
Jack Burns leads with a GOAT score of 78.2 against 78.2 for Tom Kidd — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jack Burns and Tom Kidd level at 78.2.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Burns wins: no category outright
Kidd wins: no category outright
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Burns leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Burns | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
| 🇬🇧 Kidd | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Jack Burns leads with a GOAT score of 78.2 against 78.2 for Tom Kidd — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kidd does not lead any of the five categories; Burns is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Burns: 78.2, Kidd: 78.2.
Make your case for Burns vs Kidd. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.