Who is better, Carrington or Lin Y.?
Lin Yun-ju leads with a GOAT score of 77.8 against 77.7 for Jack Carrington — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lin Yun-ju above Jack Carrington: 77.8 vs 77.7. Lin Yun-ju leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Jack Carrington leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Lin Y. wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Carrington wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-carrington-vs-lin-yun-ju
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Lin Y. leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Carrington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 22 |
| 🇹🇼 Lin Y. | 0 | 0 | 55 | 123 | 387 | 727 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CarringtonRetired | Lin Y.Active |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship appearances | 6 | — |
| England caps | 70 | — |
| English national medals | 4 | — |
| Coaching books written | 8 | — |
| Career span in years | 21 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| World Tour titles | — | 3 |
| Asian Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Career high world ranking | — | 4 |
| Years at the top level | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 68 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 80 |
Lin Yun-ju leads with a GOAT score of 77.8 against 77.7 for Jack Carrington — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Carrington scores higher on statistics, longevity. Lin Y. leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Carrington: 77.7, Lin Y.: 77.8.
Make your case for Carrington vs Lin Y.. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.