Who is better, Carrington or Abe?
Jack Carrington leads with a GOAT score of 77.7 against 77.6 for Tazuko Abe — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Carrington above Tazuko Abe: 77.7 vs 77.6. Jack Carrington leads on Longevity. Tazuko Abe leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Carrington wins: Longevity
Abe wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-carrington-vs-tazuko-abe
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Carrington leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Carrington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 22 |
| 🇯🇵 Abe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 22 | 44 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CarringtonRetired | AbeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship appearances | 6 | — |
| England caps | 70 | — |
| English national medals | 4 | — |
| Coaching books written | 8 | — |
| Career span in years | 21 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Team world titles | — | 1 |
| National titles | — | 2 |
| Seasons at international level | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 68 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 82 |
Jack Carrington leads with a GOAT score of 77.7 against 77.6 for Tazuko Abe — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Abe scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Carrington leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Carrington: 77.7, Abe: 77.6.
Make your case for Carrington vs Abe. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.