Who is better, Nicklaus or McDermott?
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 78.3 for John McDermott — a gap of 16.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Nicklaus above John McDermott: 95.0 vs 78.3. Jack Nicklaus leads on Longevity, Honours, Dominance. John McDermott leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nicklaus wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
McDermott wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-nicklaus-vs-john-mcdermott
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nicklaus leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for McDermott — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | NicklausRetired | McDermottRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major championships | 18 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 73 | — |
| Weeks at world No. 1 | 0 | — |
| Player of the Year awards | 5 | — |
| Career prize money (M$) | 5.7 | — |
| Major runner-up finishes | 19 | — |
| US Open titles | — | 2 |
| Professional wins | — | 8 |
| Youngest US Open winner age | — | 19 |
| US Open top-fives | — | 4 |
| Career span in years | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 99 | 56 |
| Honours w20% | 99 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 82 |
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 78.3 for John McDermott — a gap of 16.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McDermott scores higher on peak. Nicklaus leads on dominance, honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nicklaus: 95.0, McDermott: 78.3.
Make your case for Nicklaus vs McDermott. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.