Who is better, Nicklaus or Kaymer?
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 84.3 for Martin Kaymer — a gap of 10.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Nicklaus above Martin Kaymer: 95.0 vs 84.3. Jack Nicklaus leads on Longevity, Honours, Dominance. Martin Kaymer leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nicklaus wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Kaymer wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-nicklaus-vs-martin-kaymer
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nicklaus leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Kaymer — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Kaymer — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | NicklausRetired | KaymerActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major championships | 18 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 73 | — |
| Weeks at world No. 1 | 0 | — |
| Player of the Year awards | 5 | — |
| Career prize money (M$) | 5.7 | — |
| Major runner-up finishes | 19 | — |
| Major titles | — | 2 |
| Players Championships | — | 1 |
| European Tour wins | — | 11 |
| Weeks at world number one | — | 8 |
| Ryder Cup appearances | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 99 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 99 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 82 |
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 84.3 for Martin Kaymer — a gap of 10.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kaymer scores higher on peak. Nicklaus leads on dominance, honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nicklaus: 95.0, Kaymer: 84.3.
Make your case for Nicklaus vs Kaymer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.