Who is better, Nicklaus or Ozaki?
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 87.5 for Masashi Ozaki — a gap of 7.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Nicklaus above Masashi Ozaki: 95.0 vs 87.5. Jack Nicklaus leads on Honours, Dominance, Longevity. Masashi Ozaki leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nicklaus wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours
Ozaki wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-nicklaus-vs-masashi-ozaki
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nicklaus leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Ozaki — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | NicklausRetired | OzakiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major championships | 18 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 73 | — |
| Weeks at world No. 1 | 0 | — |
| Player of the Year awards | 5 | — |
| Career prize money (M$) | 5.7 | — |
| Major runner-up finishes | 19 | — |
| Japan Golf Tour wins | — | 94 |
| Japan money list titles | — | 12 |
| Career professional wins | — | 113 |
| Top-10 world ranking seasons | — | 6 |
| Japan Open titles | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 99 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 99 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 92 |
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 87.5 for Masashi Ozaki — a gap of 7.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ozaki scores higher on statistics. Nicklaus leads on peak, dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nicklaus: 95.0, Ozaki: 87.5.
Make your case for Nicklaus vs Ozaki. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.