Who is better, Nicklaus or Scheffler?
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 81.8 for Scottie Scheffler — a gap of 13.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Nicklaus above Scottie Scheffler: 95.0 vs 81.8. Jack Nicklaus leads on Longevity, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nicklaus wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Scheffler wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/jack-nicklaus-vs-scottie-scheffler
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nicklaus leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 22
No verified birth date for Scheffler — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 22, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | NicklausRetired | SchefflerActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major championships | 18 | — |
| PGA Tour wins | 73 | 16 |
| Weeks at world No. 1 | 0 | — |
| Player of the Year awards | 5 | — |
| Career prize money (M$) | 5.7 | — |
| Major runner-up finishes | 19 | — |
| Major titles | — | 3 |
| Masters titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| Player of the Year | — | 3 |
| Weeks at No. 1 | — | 130 |
| Dominance w25% | 94 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 99 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 99 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Jack Nicklaus leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 81.8 for Scottie Scheffler — a gap of 13.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Scheffler does not lead any of the five categories; Nicklaus is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nicklaus: 95.0, Scheffler: 81.8.
Make your case for Nicklaus vs Scheffler. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.